![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Many thanks to Astres, for the lovely new icon.
Feb. 22nd, 2009
I need a hobby.
Feb. 22nd, 2009 11:19 amNo, really.
I say this now because today![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
kniedzw and I will be hosting our annual Outrageous Clothing Mockery Oscars party, and that means a lot of time spent sitting and watching the TV. And when I do that -- or anything else that engages my eyes and brain, but not my hands (i.e. books are exempt) -- I find myself very restless, needing to do something with my hands. If I'm table-top gaming, I keep rearranging my dice, not out of superstition but a need to occupy my hands. If I'm watching TV . . . let's just say I know over a dozen varieties of solitaire, but after a while that gets boring.
I need a hobby.
The problem is, the obvious hobby -- knitting -- is not really useful here, becausekniedzw already has our knitting needs (such as they are) covered. We have all the scarves we need, and aren't in desperate need of hats or gloves or sweaters or suchlike. I could knit things for my cousins' kids, maybe, but that moves it from the category of "random thing to do while watching TV" to "obligatory thing I must finish by X time because someone's waiting for it/will outgrow it otherwise." I don't want to take on any more obligations. I want this to be something where if I don't finish it for six months it's no big deal. Crocheting is too similar to knitting, and we already have sufficient afghans in the house. Embroidery? It's a possibility -- especially if I learn more than the three stitches I presently know -- but I'm not sure what I would make. We've already got embroidered dish towels, courtesy of my mother, and I don't have any costume pieces in foreseeable need of it. (I think I was embroidering during the Oscars a couple of years ago, for the Changeling game.) Ditto inkle weaving, though I'd like to make use of the looms currently sitting around uselessly. I could learn to card weave, as I've been meaning to do for years, but at least in the short term it's likely to occupy too much of my attention to be suitable for this situation. Maybe once I know the basics, it would work. And cross-stitching is once again covered by my mother. The only patterns I like are much too complicated for me to attempt, so I leave them to her.
Other possibilities? Maybe even ones that don't involve textiles? (No, I don't know why I default to thinking of Things Involving Thread.)
I say this now because today
kniedzw and I will be hosting our annual I need a hobby.
The problem is, the obvious hobby -- knitting -- is not really useful here, because
kniedzw already has our knitting needs (such as they are) covered. We have all the scarves we need, and aren't in desperate need of hats or gloves or sweaters or suchlike. I could knit things for my cousins' kids, maybe, but that moves it from the category of "random thing to do while watching TV" to "obligatory thing I must finish by X time because someone's waiting for it/will outgrow it otherwise." I don't want to take on any more obligations. I want this to be something where if I don't finish it for six months it's no big deal. Crocheting is too similar to knitting, and we already have sufficient afghans in the house. Embroidery? It's a possibility -- especially if I learn more than the three stitches I presently know -- but I'm not sure what I would make. We've already got embroidered dish towels, courtesy of my mother, and I don't have any costume pieces in foreseeable need of it. (I think I was embroidering during the Oscars a couple of years ago, for the Changeling game.) Ditto inkle weaving, though I'd like to make use of the looms currently sitting around uselessly. I could learn to card weave, as I've been meaning to do for years, but at least in the short term it's likely to occupy too much of my attention to be suitable for this situation. Maybe once I know the basics, it would work. And cross-stitching is once again covered by my mother. The only patterns I like are much too complicated for me to attempt, so I leave them to her.Other possibilities? Maybe even ones that don't involve textiles? (No, I don't know why I default to thinking of Things Involving Thread.)
Oscar thought
Feb. 22nd, 2009 11:02 pmImagine being Anne Hathaway, twenty-six years old, sitting there twenty feet from Shirley MacLaine while she tells you how awesome she thinks you are.
I actually really liked that aspect of the Oscar ceremony -- having the acting awards presented by groups of previous winners, each of whom addressed one of the nominees personally, instead of speaking impersonally about them in the third person. And it fit the whole aesthetic of the ceremony, which was, as one of our party said, "glam on a budget." How do you do Hollywood glitz in a recession, without seeming grotesque in your conspicuous consumption? Well, inasmuch as that's even possible, you do it by hearkening back to classic Hollywood style, and also by leaning on the star power of your people, rather than big-budget displays. (lowellboyslash, I know you hated the song-and-dance numbers, but Hugh Jackman actually does a fair bit of musical theatre, and both he and (later on) Beyonce actually carried off the style of it decently well.)
Kate Winslet wins the Best Acceptance Speech award for the night, by being all sweet and touching and then telling Meryl Streep she can suck it. *^_^*
Not the most memorable ceremony ever, but we enjoyed it. The key to the Oscars, as always, is to watch them with a big ol' group of friends and as much snark as you can bring. They're dead boring on their own.
I actually really liked that aspect of the Oscar ceremony -- having the acting awards presented by groups of previous winners, each of whom addressed one of the nominees personally, instead of speaking impersonally about them in the third person. And it fit the whole aesthetic of the ceremony, which was, as one of our party said, "glam on a budget." How do you do Hollywood glitz in a recession, without seeming grotesque in your conspicuous consumption? Well, inasmuch as that's even possible, you do it by hearkening back to classic Hollywood style, and also by leaning on the star power of your people, rather than big-budget displays. (
lowellboyslash, I know you hated the song-and-dance numbers, but Hugh Jackman actually does a fair bit of musical theatre, and both he and (later on) Beyonce actually carried off the style of it decently well.)Kate Winslet wins the Best Acceptance Speech award for the night, by being all sweet and touching and then telling Meryl Streep she can suck it. *^_^*
Not the most memorable ceremony ever, but we enjoyed it. The key to the Oscars, as always, is to watch them with a big ol' group of friends and as much snark as you can bring. They're dead boring on their own.